[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive] (none)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive] (none)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Date:
Thread:
Re: [PROGRAMMERING] C# (mono) programmering med Gtk
To: SSLUG programmering <sslug@sslug>
Subject: Re: [PROGRAMMERING] C# (mono) programmering med Gtk
From: Mads Bondo Dydensborg <sslug@sslug>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:12:35 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
søndag 03 december 2006 19:59 skrev Kim Schulz:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2006 18:11:30 +0100
> Mads Bondo Dydensborg <sslug@sslug> wrote:
> [snip]
> > Igen, det er subjektivt. Der er masser af gode applikationer
> skrevet
> > i gtk. Så, det kan absolut lade sig gøre. Men, det er bare ikke,
> > IMHO, så lækkert at udvikle i som Qt/KDE.
>
> man kan så undre sig over at mange de større kendte projekter vælger at
> bruge gtk....firefox, openoffice, Adobe Flash osv.
Det vil nok være ret uproduktivt at begynde en diskussion baseret på den slags
argumenter. Jeg har angivet at det er min _subjektive_ mening at Qt er bedre
at arbejde med end gtk(mm/++).
Men, for så vidt angår dine eksempler: koden til firefox er C kode. Qt er C++.
Der er nok ikke meget grund til at begynde på et C++ GUI framework, når man
ikke vil bruge C++... ikke desto mindre har der været en qt port, som der dog
ikke er nogen der har villet vedligeholde (altså i mozilla cvs). OpenOffice -
well, Sun har vel stadig en aktie i noget der, hvor de har en interesse i at
køre med en semi-kommerciel licens nogengange. Dunno. Adobe Flash: Det er jo
lukket kode - bortset fra licensen, kan de have tekniske årsager vi ikke ved
så meget om.
Check iøvrigt hvad en del af Adobe siger om qt:
Adobe
The following describes how Adobe uses Qt technology:
"Qt simplified our task by providing high-level tools we could customize to
meet our needs. The product is excellent, the support was outstanding and we
are extremely pleased with our decision to go with Qt. "
Mike DePaoli, Adobe Photoshop Album (now Adobe Photoshop Elements)
Jeg fastholder at for _mig_ er Qt klart at foretrække.
Iøvrigt mener jeg at alle C++ udviklere der kunne tænke sig at lave en GUI
under Linux, skulle tage et godt langt kig på Qt. Det er godt. Borland syntes
jo det samme med deres Kylix. (Som af andre årsager er gået the way of the
dodo).
Mvh
Mads
--
Mads Bondo Dydensborg sslug@sslug http://www.madsdydensborg.dk/
So the lesson of BBC is that if you're misleading about whether the
government misled you into war, management must resign. What about the
simpler case -- you're just misleading about going to war?
- Lawrence Lessig (30.01.2004) on BBC and the Iraqi war
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Mads Bondo Dydensborg. sslug@sslug
NT is a closed box of point tools linked by an untouchable matrix of
invisible semaphores. These bonds are surrounded by a blizzard of
mystifying, contradictory, and forever-changing OS documentation.
Under an NT regime, almost all Unix users will lose the ability to
exert low-level control over data and applications.
Last modified
2007-01-01, 02:01 CET
[an error occurred while processing this directive] This page is maintained by
[an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc
[an error occurred while processing this directive] #
[an error occurred while processing this directive] *