[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hans-Christian Stadler wrote: > >> 1 - pthread (user + kernel) er bedre end msqX, men pthread (wall) er >> dårligere. Linux straffer single process modellen? > Jeg fandt en bedre pthread løsning, der opererer med read/write locks. > Den ser ud til at være bedre i (sys+user) end shm1, men dårligere i (real) > ved små transfervolumina. > Den giver dog baghjul til shm1 (og de andre løsninger jeg prøvede) når det > gælder for alvor. Har jag förstått det rätt när jag antar att trådar i ett C-program inte kan göra roundez-vous, dvs prata med varandra internt, utan måste gå ut till operativet?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |