[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: [ITPOLITIK] GROKLAW: 3 Initiatives to Improve the Patent Mess Announced



Carsten Svaneborg wrote:
Ellers skulle man forsøge at beskrive ideer i patentform så de
fremgår let søgebar og forståelige for patentfolk. Men dette er
et spørgsmål essentielt om at oversætte kildekode til en
semantisk beskrivelse af algoritmen. Problematisk.

"There's a lot of concern about software patents," says John Doll, commissioner for patents. "There's a huge amount of source code out there, but it's not in a usable form that examiners can access."

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2006/tc20060113_846007.htm

Jag syns att det hele er idiotisk.

Jag menar att källkod tillräckligt entydigt representerar både innovation och investering, och är ett tillräckligt entydigt objekt för att den ska gå att använda för att lösa en tvist om intrång/krænkelse.

Mjukvarupatent representerar varken innovation eller investering och är ett otydligt objekt som inte går att använda för att lösa en tvist om intång.

Är det nogen som mener noget andet?

//Erik

 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2006-02-01, 02:01 CET [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *