[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: [ITPOLITIK] GROKLAW: 3 Initiatives to Improve the Patent Mess Announced



Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Åbenhed i proceduren giver da i det mindste mulighed for at komme med
> input. Skrækeksemplet er den netop overståede sag med FAT, hvor kun MS
> havde lov til at komme med partsindlæg til USPTO.

For at spille djævlens advokat.

Spørgsmålet er om folk er interesseret i at bruge deres tid på dette,
og derfor om det fungerer i praksis. Der er credits i at være kernel
contributor, men USPTO contributor?

Jeg har tidligerer foreslået at patentansøgeren indbetaler en "pant",
som de får tilbage hvis patentet udstedes, ellers kunne den gives til
den/de folk der indrapporterer prior art.

Hvis patentkvalitetet ikke øges nævneværdigt som resultat, og OSS
bevægelsen støtter det, hvad for politisk indflydelse kan vi så
have i forsøget at forhindre at software patenteres?

-- 
  Mvh. Carsten Svaneborg
http://gauss.ffii.org


 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2006-02-01, 02:01 CET [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *