[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: [ITPOLITIK] W3c og Eolas



Carsten Svaneborg wrote:
Postgrant opposition svarer til EPO, hvor et patent kan trækkes tilbage
hvis det møder opposition inden for 8? måneder efter det er udstedt.

I Sverige er det 9 måneder. Statskontoret lämnede in sin invändning to uger före udlöbet af tiden.


>Måske findes der en lille hob om at vores politiker og vil diskutere
>"subject matter", altså graensen for det patenterbare området.


Det er vigtigt at sprede rapporten, hvilket forudsætter at vi formidler
hvorfor en amerikansk rapport om softwarepatenter er relevant i Europa.
Dvs. hvorfor kommissionens direktiv ville lede til US praksis.

Er det ikke ret simpelt? Med Kommissionens nye ofindelsebegreb er jo alt hvad en computer laver som körer et program en opfindelse? Og hvad en computer lave er jo vanligtvis "useful"?


De andre kriterier er vel ikke så ulige?

//Erik



 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:22 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *