[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
 
[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive]
Skåne Sjælland Linux User Group - http://www.sslug.dk Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Forum   Calendar   Search
MhonArc Date: [Date Prev] [Date Index] [Date Next]   Thread: [Date Prev] [Thread Index] [Date Next]   MhonArc
 

Re: [ITPOLITIK] Comon: Microsoft får patentpå fejlmeldinger



On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:07:18 +0200
Carsten Svaneborg <sslug@sslug> wrote:

> Microsoft får patent på fejlmeldinger

Aj aj, ikke helt. På en metode og system til at rapportere
fejlmeddelelser til et centralt repository. D.v.s. det er ikke
engang ideen at rapportere til et centralt repository, men måden
at gøre det på.

> Microsoft har fået godkendt et patent på den teknologi, som bruges til at 
> samle oplysninger om programfejl.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,629,267.WKU.&OS=PN/6,629,267&RS=PN/6,629,267

Jeg har fulgt linket og saxet[1]. Det er så uldent, og beskriver
ikke noget nyt, men gør faktisk heller ikke krav på at være en
opfindelse. Kravene er ikke med i teksten.

I nedenstående uddrag af teksten beskrives "metoden". Det
understreges, at exception handling subroutines i .dll/.so'er
er "well-known in the art". Så det er selvfølgelig ikke det,
som de patenterer.

Teksten slutter med, at man henviser til, at metoden overordnet
set ikke afhænger af det givne eksempel (hvori er brugt MicroSoft
navne/applikationer) se [2].

Der henvises til appended claims. Og de er ikke med, måske er det
dette, som Erik Josephsson mener med sin ultra-korte kommentar:

Erik Josephsson skrev 14:40:48 +0200
> finder det ikke her

Så vi skal finde nogle konkrete claims og så må man gå i gang
med artikler og lobbyisme.





[1]:

The system 200 further comprises a module 215 being executed by
the executable program 210 inside the application program module
205 at the time of the failure. For example, the module 215 may
be a dynamic-link library such as "mso.dll". The lines of code in
module 215 are illustrated as dashed lines in FIG. 2.

The system 200 also comprises an exception filter 220. Exception
filters are well-known in the art and may be registered by
program modules when the operating system 35 is started. When a
failure (an exception) occurs, the exception filter 220 code is
executed. For example, suppose a failure occurs while executable
program 210 is executing instructions running module 215 at
location 225. If executable program 210 has registered exception
filter 220 with the operating system, then the exception filter
220 is executed when executable program 210 encounters an
exception. 


[2].

Although the present invention has been described above as
implemented in a preferred application program module, it will be
understood that alternative embodiments will become apparent to
those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains
without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the
scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims
rather than the foregoing description.


-- 
sslug@sslug -- Linux works for me.  http://d-axel.dk/


 
Home   Subscribe   Mail Archive   Index   Calendar   Search

 
 
Questions about the web-pages to <www_admin>. Last modified 2005-08-10, 20:22 CEST [an error occurred while processing this directive]
This page is maintained by [an error occurred while processing this directive]MHonArc [an error occurred while processing this directive] # [an error occurred while processing this directive] *