[an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] (none) [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive] [an error occurred while processing this directive][an error occurred while processing this directive]![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:06:27PM +0200, Erik Josefsson wrote: > On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 13:18, Carsten Svaneborg wrote: > > > Hun valgte også at definere "computer-implementerede opfindelser" > > som programmer for vaskemaskiner oa. og nægtede dermed at diskutere > > patenter på softwarefunktioner på en normal computer. > > Det er ikke korrekt. Definitionen var "hvad en computer laver hvornaer > du kör et computer program i den": > > "a "computer-implemented invention" means an invention the performance > of which involves the use of a computer and having features which are > realised by means of a computer program." Hmm, det er jo klart at en datamaskine skal involveres. Det store spørgsmål for mig er om det er en trojansk hest, eller en vaskemaskine, vi taler om. Og for os Linux-brugere, om helt almindelig brug af en datamaskine kan krænke swpat. Hvis det udelukkes *klart* så synes jeg det er i orden med swpat. Så er Linux i sikker havn, og der er kun problemer hvis linux bruges til styring af vaskemaskiner og andre apparater. Hilsen keld
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |